Home | Cases | Byrne v Van Tienhoven

 

Key information

Court
Court of Common Pleas (England)

Issues
Agreement
(offer - revocation - acceptance)

AustraliaByrne v Van Tienhoven

Court of Common Pleas (1880) LR 5 CPD 344

 

Facts

D's offered to sell goods to P by letter dated 1 October. On 8 October, prior to acceptance, D's posted a letter revoking the offer. This letter was received by P on 20 October. In the meantime, on 11 October P received the letter and dispatched an acceptance. Was there a contract?

Held (Lindley J)

To be effective revocation must be communicated. Where post is used for acceptance, acceptance occurs when and where sent (provided it is contemplated as a means of acceptance) (the 'postal rule'). However, this rule does not apply in relation to revocation of offers - thus, if post is used for revocation, communication is only effective if and when it is received by the offeree. As this occurred after acceptance there was a contract formed in this case.

An offer was containing a price escalation clause.  A counter offer was then made without this clause; it contained a detachable receipt which the company (original offeror) sent back with a notation that they assumed it was on their terms.

`